HEARTFELT Study

The HEARTFELT Study is a pragmatic, single-blind, randomized crossover trial testing the effectiveness of autonomous remote patient peripheral edema monitoring and reporting in HEART FailurE compared with conventionaL remoTe patient monitoring.

Primary objective

Establish whether the Heartfelt device is safe to use and effective at reducing heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs).

Study size and follow-up

What is the Heartfelt Device?

The Heartfelt Device is a small, non-invasive home-based sensor that measures the volume of a patient’s feet and lower legs as they walk past it.

If the device detects that a patient’s peripheral edema is increasing, it can send a health alert to the clinical team. That may lead to a phone call or review to check symptoms and, if needed, adjust treatment.

Because it works automatically, it can collect much more health information than normal home monitoring.

The Heartfelt Device

A patient seated near a scanner that detects movement within a three-metre radius.

Patient Detection

The Heartfelt Device scans a three-metre radius.

A top-down diagram showing AI tracking a patient as they move around the room.

Patient Tracking with AI

AI technology tracks a patient as they move around the room to capture 360-degree imagery.

A captured grayscale image of a patient's foot and ankle.

Image Capture

The scanner takes 1,200 pictures a minute to create a 3D image.

A 3D rendering of a foot used to calculate its volume.

Foot Volume Calculation

A virtual "tank" of water around the 3D foot assesses its volume.

A clinician viewing trend lines on a screen while holding a phone that shows an alert.

Alert and Action

If the foot volume gets too high, indicating fluid retention, an alert is sent and action is taken if the patient is on the interventional arm.

The data behind the device

Study description

This study looks at the effect of using a remote patient monitoring device, the Heartfelt device, with health alerts to monitor the development of peripheral edema in patients with heart failure (HF). The hypothesis is that this passive measurement method will lead to better data availability, which in turn will improve patient care and reduce hospitalizations for the management of worsening HF (HFHs).

Participants will be recruited through Remote Patient Monitoring Providers (RPMPs) in the United States, using crossover randomization between standard care and Heartfelt device usage with health alerts sent to RPMPs. The RPMPs will follow a protocolized intervention when responding to raised alerts.

Study flow

The schematic below summarizes the screening, enrollment, randomization, and follow-up structure for the study.

Scroll horizontally or vertically to view the full chart.

Scrollable flowchart showing the same content summarised above.

Patients with at least two heart failure events over the past 24 months, one of which resulted in hospitalization with peripheral edema reported, and with at least one event in the past 6 months
Filter
Historical HF and all-cause hospitalizations reported split by RPM adherence over 180 days prior to screening

Adherence thresholds of [0-25%), [25-50%), [50-75%), [75-100%)
Adjudication of max 300 events per bin, random sampling over all events in bin if more than 300 to adjudicate to establish %HF
Adherence bin?
>=50%
Exclude, report HF and all-cause hospitalizations over 12 months from screening per bin
<50%
Meet inclusion/exclusion criteria
Uniform random sample and consent until target recruitment
Exclude non-consenting or excess patients, report HF and all-cause hospitalizations over 12 months from screening per bin
Device installation within 60 days of consent, and at least 14 days post-discharge if recently hospitalized
Day 0: Patient starts study at 'Activation date'. Randomization of crossover sequences.
Randomly assigned
21 Days Washout (Standard care)
81 Days Alerts off, RPMP data off (Standard care #1)
81 Days Alerts off, RPMP data off (Standard care #2)
21 Days Washout (Intervention)
162 Days Intervention (Standard care + Heartfelt)
21 Days Washout (Intervention)
162 Days Intervention (Standard care + Heartfelt)
21 Days Washout (Standard care)
81 Days Alerts off, RPMP data off (Standard care #1)
81 Days Alerts off, RPMP data off (Standard care #2)
Random Order: Up to 3.5 years in any breakdown of intervention and control timeframes, example below
3-9 months intervention
3 months no intervention
6-9 months intervention
3 months no intervention
6-9 months intervention
etc.
Flowchart summary
  1. Start with patients who have had at least two heart failure events over the past 24 months, with one hospitalization that reported peripheral edema, and at least one event in the past 6 months.
  2. Filter using historical HF and all-cause hospitalizations reported by RPM adherence over the 180 days before screening. Use adherence thresholds of [0-25%), [25-50%), [50-75%), and [75-100%). Adjudicate a maximum of 300 events per bin and, if a bin contains more than 300 events, randomly sample events in that bin to establish the percentage that are HF-related.
  3. Split patients by adherence bin. If adherence is >=50%, exclude and report HF and all-cause hospitalizations over 12 months from screening for that bin. If adherence is <50%, apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  4. From the eligible <50% group, take a uniform random sample and obtain consent until the recruitment target is reached. Exclude non-consenting or excess patients, and report HF and all-cause hospitalizations over 12 months from screening for that bin.
  5. Install the device within 60 days of consent, and at least 14 days after discharge if the patient was recently hospitalized.
  6. On Day 0, the patient starts the study at the Activation date and is randomized into one of the crossover sequences.
  7. Sequence 1: 21 days washout (standard care), 81 days with alerts off and RPMP data off (standard care #1), 81 days with alerts off and RPMP data off (standard care #2), 21 days washout (intervention), and 162 days intervention (standard care + Heartfelt).
  8. Sequence 2: 21 days washout (intervention), 162 days intervention (standard care + Heartfelt), 21 days washout (standard care), 81 days with alerts off and RPMP data off (standard care #1), and 81 days with alerts off and RPMP data off (standard care #2).
  9. The random order can continue for up to 3.5 years using any breakdown of intervention and no-intervention periods. The example shown alternates 3-9 month intervention blocks with 3 month no-intervention blocks, then continues.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet the study’s full eligibility requirements. The key inclusion criteria are:

Exclusion criteria

Key exclusion criteria include:

Study duration

What are we trying to find out?

The study aims to answer the following questions:

Is the device safe?

Yes. The device is non-invasive and contact-free. Patients’ privacy is protected because the device only captures images of lower legs, and no personal details are stored with those images.

Who is running the study?

The study is sponsored by Heartfelt Technologies.

The Study Chair is Dr. W. H. Wilson Tang from the Cleveland Clinic.

Where is the study taking place?

Participants are recruited by Remote Patient Monitoring Companies across the United States.